Re: "failed" vs "released" and "locked-out" state and --incremental auto-re-adding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doug Ledford <dledford <at> redhat.com> writes:

> 
> On 04/27/2010 06:13 AM, Christian Gatzemeier wrote:
>
> > There we have a very good word to name --remove so that mdadm is easier to
> > understand (IMHO). "release"
> 
> You're probably right, but it's also too late to change it now 
> Remove has been in use for quite some time and there are untold numbers
> of programs and scripts that use it as it is so that it would be very
> difficult to change it.

I agree. The only thing one could probably do is adding a --release option that
just does the same as --remove, and maybe depreciating --remove when refering to
that action (but of course never actually removing it).

In any case thank you for your enhancements and fine explanations.


Christian





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux