Re: Why do arrays start without some components?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Asdo <asdo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Simon Matthews wrote:
>>
>> I have a couple of machines on which this is happening now --
>>
>> When the machine boots, the RAID arrays (RAID 1) start, but each array
>> only has one component device. I can add the other component again
>> (using mdadm --add ... ) and the array will sync up, but next time it
>> boots, I have to do the same once more.
>>
>> Why is this and how do I fix it?
>>
>
> Might that be a /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf in the initramfs listing fewer devices
> than it should?
> I am not sure (because in this case maybe it shouldn't autoassemble the
> array at all), but have a look by unpacking your initramfs. If yes, update
> it.

I don't have an initramfs. This is a Gentoo system and I built the
kernel with all the drivers required to boot built in. This includes
RAID support.

> Or could that be a controller that shows the disks to the kernel too late...
> do you have multiple controllers?

I don't think so, on one machine they are SATA drives, but only one controller.

But, perhaps on the other machine, this may be happening, since the
drive that includes the component that is left out of the array is on
an add-in controller. On this machine, the problematic array uses IDE
drives for its components.

Simon

>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux