On 13/03/2010 15:21, Majed B. wrote:
You should never degrade the array to copy its contents. Its very risky. There might be bad sectors on one or more disks and if you don't have all disks at hand, you may not be able to rebuild the array on the new disk.
OK that's fair, you're right I don't want to risk losing data because I was using a degraded array.
As for using dd, as others have pointed, the metadata won't be in place and if you create a new array after using dd, it'll still require a resync and the data will be destroyed.
I don't see whay either it'd require a resync - although I didn't say it, I was planning to zero the rest of the larger drives and recreate with --assume-clean - nor why data would be destroyed if I didn't create with --assume-clean, after all the data will all be in the right place.
But I think on balance I'm going to save the contents of the original array to an extra drive, create a new array on the big discs, and copy the data back. It shouldn't take too much more time than copying the discs individually with dd, even though I'm copying the data twice rather than once, and it's both safer and gives me a free defrag.
Cheers, John. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
