Re: Maybe crazy idea for reshaping: Instant/On-Demand reshaping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:39:29 +0100
Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 06:27:54 +0100
> > Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> So what do you think? Is this lack of cafein speaking?
> >
> > I think your cost-benefit trade-off is way off balance on the cost side.
> >
> > This sort of complexity really belongs in a filesystem, not in a a block
> > device.
> >
> > NeilBrown
> 
> So you are saying I should be using zfs instead of ext3+raid5. :)

No, I'm saying that you should fund me for a year or two so I can stop
worrying about bug fixing and md features, and can finish writing the
filesystem that I have been working on for over a decade.  It will,
naturally, be able to to everything including cure the common cold.

NeilBrown


> 
> When I read up on zfs last year it could not do any reshaping at
> all. You could only add new pools but not reshape an existing one.
> 
> MfG
>         Goswin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux