Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14/02/2010 19:13, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, you wrote:
On 14/02/2010 18:40, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 14 Februar 2010, you wrote:
In other words, 'auto-detection' for 1.x format devices is using an
initrd/initramfs.
which makes 1.x format useless for everybody who does not want to deal
with initrd/initramfs.
True, but afaik every distro uses an initrd/initramfs and bundles tools
making it easy to manage and customise them, so what's the problem?

and distros do it because of all the drivers they have to ship. But for example I am not bound by such limitations. Why should I deal with that? It is hard enough not to forget 'make modules_install'. And now add initrd. Autodetecting just works - but if you use an initrd an it doesn't. Where do you start?

Initrd's maybe great for distro packagers, but are they really usefull for anybody else?

Not just for distro packagers, they're useful for distro users, which are presumably 99% of Linux users these days, including the vast majority of enterprise users who like tested, supported systems.

But even for people building their own kernels, initrd/initramfs are useful if you're using LVM, or indeed trying to boot off anything that's not a simple device.

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux