Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Hello All ,

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Rudy Zijlstra wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
In Fedora 12, for example, Dracut tries to make the distinction between
whole RAID device and a partition device, and utterly fails -- often
resulting in data loss.

i do not use Fedora/redhat and do not intent to ever try them again... still, the point is valid
With a pointer to the beginning this would have been a trivial thing to
detect.

IMO it would make sense to support autoassemble for 1.0 superblocks, and
making them the default.  The purpose would be to get everyone off 0.9.
 However, *any* default is better than 1.1.
	-hpa
As long is autodetect is supported in the kernel, i am willing to upgrade to 1.0 superblocks. BUT i need the autodetect in the kernel, as i refuse to use initrd for production servers.
Cheers,
Rudy
	I also have to agree with Rudy in this matter .

		Tia ,  JimL
--
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James   W.   Laferriere | System    Techniques | Give me VMS     |
| Network&System Engineer | 3237     Holden Road |  Give me Linux  |
| babydr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Fairbanks, AK. 99709 |   only  on  AXP |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux