On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:41:38 +0100 Luca Berra <bluca@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:28:03PM +0100, Giovanni Tessore wrote: > > Is this some kind of bug? > No I'm not sure I agree. If a device is generating lots of read errors, we really should do something proactive about that. If there is a hot spare, then building onto that while keeping the original active (yes, still on the todo list) would be a good thing to do. v1.x metadata allows the number of corrected errors to be recorded across restarts so a real long-term value can be used as a trigger. So there certainly are useful improvements that could be made here. NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
