RE: Why does one get mismatches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just tried and miss-match count is zero. Interesting, is XOR engine
doing something wrong ? . Then I ran a test where I raw-write the file
to /dev/md0. Then did the raw-read for the same size. In this case XOR
matched as expected. Then I failed a drive using "mdadm -f /dev/md0
/dev/sda". Then I read the same size data again from /dev/md0. And
checksum matches too. 
What is this mean XOR engine is doing right thing. But "chec/repair"
test is not functioning properly with XOR-engine ?

Or is this something to do with  how the buffers are handled ? may they
are cached ?


-Marri



-----Original Message-----
From: goswin-v-b@xxxxxx [mailto:goswin-v-b@xxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:24 AM
To: Tirumala Reddy Marri
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Why does one get mismatches?

"Tirumala Reddy Marri" <tmarri@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I have noticed that if I zero the /dev/md0 using "dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/md0 bs=4k count=64k". Then I run the "echo check >
> /sys/block/md0/md/sync_action", no mismatch_cnt reported.  If I use
> "if=/some/file" then I see miss match count to set to huge number.
>
> I am testing with small RAID-5 size for quick testing.  How a reliable
> is this test ? I am using HW accelerated XOR engine for RAID-5.

Have you tried without?

Maybe the XOR engine creates garbage.

MfG
        Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux