Re: Read errors on raid5 ignored, array still clean .. then disaster !!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Giovanni Tessore wrote:

I didn't setup smart monitoring... Luca is right.
But I dont like the idea that md relies on another tool, that could be
not installed or correctly configured, to warn the user on potential
critical situations which involve directly itself.

Or you build systems around a controller* that works with smartd, only to find that smartd support breaks in later kernel versions and finding suitable replacements has proven difficult. :(

*LSI SAS

http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125293858330877&w=2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512613

Regards,

Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux