Re: Question about raid robustness when disk fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



MichaÅ? Sawicz <michal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Dnia 2010-01-25, pon o godzinie 18:51 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow pisze:
>> The only values I would keep a close eye on is remapped sectors and
>> pending sectors. Anything else gives nice graphs but I always feel is
>> totaly useless. And even the pending sectors are != 0 on one drive
>> while
>> badblocks reports no errors on repeated passes. The drive just doesn't
>> seem to reduce the count when it successfully remaps a sector. 
>
> I read today that Samsungs show that behavior. Maybe this is the case?

I usualy buy one or at most 2 new disks at a time so my drives are all
different makes and models. Might verry well be a samsung drive that has
that behaviour.

MfG
        Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux