Re: raid failure question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon January 11 2010, Majed B. wrote:
> Voltage spikes, disks heating (monitored by smartd) & sector
> corruption (monitored by smartd) are what I can think of for the time
> being.

Would that actually make it so a hot spare wouldn't get used automatically? 
I thought the point of a hot spare was to take over for a failed disk /no 
matter what/. Doesn't really make much sense is many of the more common 
error cases cause a hot spare to be ignored.

> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Tim Bock <jtbock@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Excluding the obvious multi-disk or bus failures, can anyone describe
> > what type of disk failure a raid cannot detect/recover from?
> >
> > I have had two disk failures over the last three months, and in spite
> > of having a hot spare, manual intervention was required each time to
> > make the raid usable again.  I'm just not sure if I'm not setting
> > something up right, or if there is some other issue.
> >
> > Thanks for any comments or suggestions.
> >
> > Tim
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux