Re: [PATCH] md: make recovery started by do_md_run() visible via sync_action

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:18:36 -0700
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> By default md_do_sync() will perform recovery if no other actions are
> specified.  However, action_show() relies on MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER to be
> set otherwise it returns 'idle'.  So, add a missing set
> MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER when starting recovery.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Neil,
> 
> One more to finish off recovery checkpoint support.  Without this mdmon
> never notices that the array was rebuilding and never marks the
> completion.  I did not see any urgency to workaround this in the mdadm
> patchset, but let me know if you think a "kernel version > 2.6.33-rcX"
> check is warranted.

Thanks Dan.
This is "obviously correct" and I have queued it.
However...
I wonder if we want that code in do_md_run at all.
It claims to be there because if we leave the recovery to
md_check_recovery, then it will remove and re-add the spares,
and this will lose the recovery_offset information.

However presumably the same problem applies to recovery_offset
information that we set manually.  Won't the call to
remove_and_add_spares() lose that information too?

I think we need to make sure that remove_and_add_spares
doesn't lose information that we want to keep, and then
remove this code from do_md_run.

So my first question is:  did the current code really work for you?
It looks like it would zero recovery_offset in remove_and_add_spares ??

No, I don't think you want a kernel-version test just for this.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
>  drivers/md/md.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 1cc5f2d..fa93de0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -4286,6 +4286,7 @@ static int do_md_run(mddev_t * mddev)
>  		if (spares && mddev->pers->sync_request) {
>  			mddev->recovery = 0;
>  			set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RUNNING, &mddev->recovery);
> +			set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_RECOVER, &mddev->recovery);
>  			mddev->sync_thread = md_register_thread(md_do_sync,
>  								mddev,
>  								"resync");

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux