Re: Typical RAID5 transfer speeds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/12/2009 01:05, Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Saturday 19 December 2009, Matt Tehonica wrote:
I have a 4 disk RAID5 using a 2048K chunk size and using XFS

4 disks is a bad idea. You should have 2^n data disks, but you have 2^1 + 1 = 3 data disks. As parity information are calculated in the power of two and blocks are written in the power of two

Sorry, but where did you get that from? p = d1 xor d2 xor d3 has nothing to do with powers of two, and I'm sure blocks are written whenever they need to be, not in powers of two.

you probably have read operations, when you only want to write.

That will depend on how much data you're trying to write. With 3 data discs and a 2M chunk size, writes in multiples of 6M won't need reads. Writing a 25M file would therefore write 4 stripes and need to read to do the last 1M. With 4 data discs, it'd be 8M multiples, and you'd write 3 stripes and need a read to do the last 1M. No difference.

Cheers,

John.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux