Oh, I thought this was a backup system. I always ramp up the speed on
min & max to have the resync & reshapes finish fast, but at the loss
of performance during that.
You mentioned that you've unmounted the filesystem, so why does it
make a different if you max the speed? Or do you have other services
running?
I think at the time I needed a new mdadm, I downloaded 3.0 which is
the stable one for now (3.1 was pulled -- donno about 3.1.1).
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Have you made sure that the value of
>> /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min is high enough? (200000 means 200
>
> High enough? Wouldn't a higher speed limit mean more stress on the systems?
> Its value is 1000.
>
>> MB/s) along with /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max?
>
> It's 200,000
>
>> I interrupted an array resyncing a couple of times without issues.
>> Only one time I interrupted an array during growth process and I had
>> an old version of mdadm (2.6.3) which didn't support resuming that. I
>> think Neil told me that 2.6.9 is the minimum requirement to resume.
>
> It's 2.6.7.2. Debian does not admit new software into its distro until they
> are rock hard stable, unless it is a bug fix release. I guess I'll have to
> wait a few more days.
>
>
>
--
Majed B.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
