On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Leslie Rhorer <lrhorer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Have you made sure that the value of >> /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min is high enough? (200000 means 200 > > High enough? Wouldn't a higher speed limit mean more stress on the systems? > Its value is 1000. > >> MB/s) along with /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max? > > It's 200,000 > >> I interrupted an array resyncing a couple of times without issues. >> Only one time I interrupted an array during growth process and I had >> an old version of mdadm (2.6.3) which didn't support resuming that. I >> think Neil told me that 2.6.9 is the minimum requirement to resume. > > It's 2.6.7.2. Debian does not admit new software into its distro until they > are rock hard stable, unless it is a bug fix release. I guess I'll have to > wait a few more days. > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > You could seek out a testing version or compile it your self. mdadm doesn't depend on that much... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
