Neil Brown wrote: > This is not a RAID problem - it was a problem with the grsec patches. > They assume that any atomic variable is used as a counter and should not > overflow. That is not the case with bd_disk->sync_io. It is expected to > overflow. So the "PAX: ..." report is a false positive. > Thank you, i've reported the bug to the grsec guys. Regards, Raphaël -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
