Re: Possible bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:18:24 +0100
ml-raid@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hello,
> I have a 2.6.27.29-4-grsec (from http://kernelsec.cr0.org) Linux box, on
> x86, running debian lenny. On sunday, during the monthly rebuild of my
> standard RAID1 setup (/proc/mdstat):
> 
> Personalities : [raid1]
> md127 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
>       488383936 blocks [2/2] [UU]
> 
> unused devices: <none>
> 
> The kernel started outputting thousands of backtraces (see attached log)
> The IO throughput was drastically reduced but the resync finally
> completed after about 38 hours.
> 
> This is the first time I have been bitten by this bug. The server has
> been running on this kernel for 74 days and the previous resync didn't
> exhibit any problem.

This is not a RAID problem - it was a problem with the grsec patches.
They assume that any atomic variable is used as a counter and should not
overflow.  That is not the case with bd_disk->sync_io.  It is expected to
overflow.  So the "PAX: ..." report is a false positive.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux