Re: Question for Neil/Superblocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 16:27 -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> A couple of things, recently I tried to make a new system (MDADM/latest/SW 
> RAID1) and noticed that GRUB & LILO still only support 0.90 superblocks. 
> This leads me to my next question.
> 
> Will the newer superblocks be supported? I ask this due to my final 
> question.
> 
> With 0.90 superblocks, I have never seen any array (raid1,raid5,raid6) try 
> to correct a read-error, but when I made an array with 1.2 superblocks 
> (not the boot volume of course) using VelociRaptors, great for testing 
> crap disks that don't work in read, I did see it try to correct read 
> errors!  I was wondering if that is only applicable to superblocks >= 
> 1.x+?
> 
> I know you can build yourself an initrd/miniroot so/on/so forth but its 
> nice when you can just build a kernel, run lilo and have it auto-detect 
> the raid1 volumes and boot accordingly (as you can with 0.90 superblocks).
have a separate boot partition raid1....


> 
> Justin.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux