Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 10,  7:22am, "Neil F Brown" wrote:
} Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn

Good morning to everyone, hope the week is progressing well.

<snip>
It may be heresy but I would suggest that if the defaults change we
should also implement support for auto-starting version 1.x devices,
or some appropriate subset of them.

I understand and appreciate the concerns of the userspace start
community.  However, we do a lot of storage on very dedicated systems
and I have spent far more time unsnarling systems with blown
initrd/initramfs setups and other boot issues than I have recovering
from starting RAID volumes on the wrong box.  Thats why I don't let
udev anywhere near production machines and I am still living on 0.9
metadata in spite of its limitations.

UNIX has always been about allowing people to shoot themselves in the
foot if they so desire.  I think an acceptable compromise would be to
move toward a default of disabled auto-detection with the option to
turn on detection of all meta-data types if people choose to do that.

+1


Cheers,

Rudy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux