-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Wagoner wrote: > iSCSI is a block level protocol while NFS and Samba work at the file > level. They all have their specific uses and advantages / > disadvantages. > >> I wouldn't even consider NFS or Samba because they are ancient bloatware. I gather from a prior post that rsync has a remote ssh function. If that's not the case then I guess it has to be sshfs. > > No NFS and Samba are not ancient bloatware. What other protocol would > you use for a company file server? Rsync and SSH are not replacements > for group file sharing. > > Just use rsync over SSH. Simple and reliable. Openafs - http://www.openafs.org MfG, Lars Schimmer - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------- TU Graz, Institut für ComputerGraphik & WissensVisualisierung Tel: +43 316 873-5405 E-Mail: l.schimmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Fax: +43 316 873-5402 PGP-Key-ID: 0x4A9B1723 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkroE/UACgkQmWhuE0qbFyMUrQCdHe0IWxN48CRSsaYtdHppuj2y gTkAoImQEOR10Cl20aQMPulrPCD4Yexp =cs7w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
