Re: RAID1 assembled broken array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday September 17, matthias@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:44 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > >> 1.0 also protects from this problem.
> > >
> > > So what's the best way to update a 0.9 superblock to 1.0 format?
> > >
> > > mdadm --assemble --metadata=1.0 --update=summaries ... ?
> > 
> > I don't think you can.  You just have to create a new array with the  
> > new superblock.
> > 
> Hmm. Looks like you're right.
> 
> Consider this to be a feature request, then. If 1.0 is more reasonable
> than 0.9, there should be a "safe" upgrade path.

Yes, definitely.  There should be.

Now if only there were more hours in the day.... :-)

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux