0.9 shouldn't be the default if 1.0 or 1.x is better anyway :/ On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Matthias Urlichs <matthias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:44 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: >> >> 1.0 also protects from this problem. >> > >> > So what's the best way to update a 0.9 superblock to 1.0 format? >> > >> > mdadm --assemble --metadata=1.0 --update=summaries ... ? >> >> I don't think you can. You just have to create a new array with the >> new superblock. >> > Hmm. Looks like you're right. > > Consider this to be a feature request, then. If 1.0 is more reasonable > than 0.9, there should be a "safe" upgrade path. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Majed B. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
