Re: Raid 5 - not clean and then a failure.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/08/2009 12:29, Jon Hardcastle wrote:
[...]
I did look into bitmaps *abit* i could easily have the imagine for my 6 drive raid 5 stored on the raid1 I have in the same system.. The googling I did tho did not paint a pretty picture it talked about huge performance hits?

There is a performance hit but it can be minimised by picking a bitmap chunk size to suit; I ended up getting about 80% of bitmap-less write performance using a 16MB bitmap chunk size instead of about 40% with the default size, on my 3-drive RAID-5 array.

Cheers,

John.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux