Re: -z not on RAID0 / MPIO hurdle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



mark delfman <markdelfman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi.... I am hopeful that the group could provide me with some advice
> regarding limiting the drive size on a RAID0.  I know and use the â??z
> option for other raid levels, but this seems to have no effect on
> RAID0.
>
> I am sure many will ask â??why botherâ?? or â??use fdiskâ?? but the problem is:
>
> We need to have some preserved information on each drive â?? can be only
> a few MB at the end of the drive for example
> In the past we have simply used Fdisk to partition, save our data on
> Sdx2 and used Mdadm on Sdx1  (which works fine)
> But we are looking to move to dual channel SAS drives and use DM MPIO
>
> DM MPIO works fine also, but not on the partitions, only the whole
> drive.  So when we MDadm DMx it overwrites the SdX2 partition etc.
>
> The answer was that we used the â??z and limited the drive size and
> simply used DD to write our data to the end LBAâ??s....
>
> But on RAID0 the â??z does not seem to function, so I cant think of a
> way around this ï??  (other than changing the LBA range in the drive and
> this is restricted I think)
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas?  I appreciate any help

LVM and --setphysicalvolumesize on pvcreate?

MfG
        Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux