Re: Missing md superblock on added devices after grow ...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 24, 2009 1:03 am, rdc wrote:
> Yesterday i grew my 4*500GB raid5 array to 7*500GB. The reshape operation
> ended succesfully according to the logs :
>
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel] md: md2: reshape done.
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel] RAID5 conf printout:
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  --- rd:7 wd:7
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 0, o:1, dev:dm-3
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 1, o:1, dev:dm-0
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 2, o:1, dev:dm-2
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 3, o:1, dev:dm-1
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 4, o:1, dev:dm-8
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 5, o:1, dev:dm-6
> May 22 22:24:56 [kernel]  disk 6, o:1, dev:dm-5

The devices in your array are dm-xx devices, but....

>
> However, upon restarting this morning the grown array was no longer
> detected,
> and my investigation revealed that the 3 device that were added do not
> contain
> an md superblock at all !
>
> One of the 3 new devices :
> mdadm --examine -v /dev/sdb1
> mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/sdb1.

... you are looking on sdxx devices for the superblock.  This
seem to me to be a strange thing to do.
What does
   mdadm --example /dev/mapper/whatever
show?

What exactly are the dm-xx devices?

NeilBrown


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux