On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 2:46 PM, raz ben yehuda <raziebe@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Neil Hello > The bellow is the raid0 grow code.I have decided to fix raid0 and not > perform the transformation raid0-raid4-raid0 due to two reasons: > 1. raid0 zones. this patch support any zone transformations. > 2. Undesired dependency of raid0 over raid4 re-striping code. Hi Raz, Can you explain a bit more about why the raid4 approach is undesirable? I think making reshape only available to raid0 arrays where all the members are the same size is a reasonable constraint. We then get the nice benefit of reusing the raid5 reshape infrastructure. In other words I am not convinced that the benefits of reimplementing reshape in raid0 outweigh the costs. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
