On Friday May 15, maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > As mentioned by Neil, the raid0 hash table does probably not add > any value and contains some rather strange code that manipulates the > various sector counts needed to maintain this table. > > This patch series against Neil's for-next tree as of yesterday removes > the hash table from the raid0 code. Thanks. All applied, and pushed out to git://neil.brown.name/md for-next I've added a couple more patches to remove a couple of fields from struct strip_zone. I'll post them shortly for comment. And thanks for finding the memory leak! NeilBrown -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
