On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Raz <raziebe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > where else ? See you were the one who has sent out the patch. Ok? Then you should know the reason for patch? What I had asked from Neil is an RFC Cross Checking the Patch. So I donot expect an Reply From You. Ok? >> taking care of 4k*n data sets. >> What I see of this patch is that it specifically checks for some sort >> of 4K Boundaries. > instead of 4K*2^n where n>=0 > correct and recompure IO posistion. >>> fprintf(stderr, Name ": invalid chunk/rounding value: %s\n", Could you tell me how 4K*2^n is used to do the patch what ever it was sent for? Or is it that the patch is incomplete. Kindly Maintain Some sort of mailing list courtesy.Ok? Reply only when you are asked to. Ok? -- -- Sujit K M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
