On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:31 PM, SandeepKsinha <sandeepksinha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The number of strip_zones of a raid0 array is bounded by the number of
>> drives in the array and is in fact much smaller for typical setups. For
>> example, any raid0 array containing identical disks will have only
>> a single strip_zone.
>>
>> Therefore, the hash tables which are used for quickly finding the
>> strip_zone that holds a particular sector are of questionable value
>> and add quite a bit of unnecessary complexity.
>>
>> This patch replaces the hash table lookup by equivalent code which
>> simply loops over all strip zones to find the zone that holds the
>> given sector.
>>
>> Subsequent cleanup patches will remove the hash table structure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/raid0.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
>> index c08d755..9fd3c3c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
>> @@ -398,6 +398,22 @@ static int raid0_stop (mddev_t *mddev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* Find the zone which holds a particular offset */
>> +static struct strip_zone *find_zone(struct raid0_private_data *conf,
>> + sector_t sector)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < conf->nr_strip_zones; i++) {
>> + struct strip_zone *z = conf->strip_zone + i;
>> +
>> + if (sector < z->zone_start + z->sectors)
>> + return z;
>> + }
>> + BUG();
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>
> The point here is that rather than figuring the issue after traversing
> through the list of all the zones,
> you can make a check and smartly get away with the situation without
> wasting extra effort.
>
> int i;
>
> BUG_ON(sector > conf->stripe_zone[0].sectors);
>
> for (i = 0; i < conf->nr_strip_zones; i++) {
> struct strip_zone *z = conf->strip_zone + i;
>
> if (sector < z->zone_start + z->sectors)
> return z;
> }
>
> return NULL;
>
Sorry taken back. This won't exactly help. But thinking in similar
lines can be helpful.
>
>
>> static int raid0_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> {
>> mddev_t *mddev = q->queuedata;
>> @@ -443,20 +459,10 @@ static int raid0_make_request (struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> bio_pair_release(bp);
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -
>> -
>> - {
>> - sector_t x = sector >> conf->sector_shift;
>> - sector_div(x, (u32)conf->spacing);
>> - zone = conf->hash_table[x];
>> - }
>> -
>> - while (sector >= zone->zone_start + zone->sectors)
>> - zone++;
>> -
>> + zone = find_zone(conf, sector);
>> + if (!zone)
>> + return 1;
>> sect_in_chunk = bio->bi_sector & (chunk_sects - 1);
>> -
>> -
>> {
>> sector_t x = (sector - zone->zone_start) >> chunksect_bits;
>>
>> --
>> 1.5.4.3
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sandeep.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> “To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner.”
>
--
Regards,
Sandeep.
“To learn is to change. Education is a process that changes the learner.”
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
