How do people deal with disk size variations?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a 5-disk raid5. I notice that the five identical disks, which also
list identical LBA numbers on the label, do not show the same size when
queried. One is reporting (smart - it should tell the truth from the disk
pov) a smaller size.

One disk reports
	User Capacity: 1,000,203,804,160 bytes
and the other four
	User Capacity: 1,000,204,886,016 bytes

Luckily I always build a raid on partitions so this difference is
irrelevant being in the slack past the partition end.

However, if I managed to use the whole disk, the raid will be as large as
the smallest disk. What happens when I replace a disk and get an even
smaller replacement one?

Do people always leave unused space at the end? Do you expect disks from
the same exact model to have exactly the same usable size?

BTW, even if the label gave the correct size, one does not know in
advance what will arrive when you order a disk, right?

cheers

--
Eyal Lebedinsky	(eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux