Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe <Mario.Holbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, mdadm -A /dev/md7; mdadm --add /dev/md7 /dev/sd[fgh]1 seems to
> respect the bitmap, but first adds the first spare only and the two
...
> According to your previous mail, I will run into your case 3/ this way,
> the bug where the bitmap is cleared too early, will I?
All right, I applied your "[md PATCH 2/7] md/raid10: don't clear bitmap
during recovery if array will still be degraded." patch, modified about
2% of my fully degraded raid10, synched the 3 missing devices, compared
the mirrors and found no difference, so I guess I can confirm the patch
works for me :)
regards
Mario
--
The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement.
But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth.
-- Niels Bohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
