Hi Neil, I am debugging what appears to be a race between mdadm and mdmon manipulating md/array_state. The following warnings were originally triggered by the validation team in Poland. I was not able to reproduce it on my development system until I modified mdmon to hammer on array_state and can now produce the same failure signature: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:462 sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d() Hardware name: sysfs: duplicate filename 'sync_action' can not be created Modules linked in: raid10... Supported: Yes Pid: 8696, comm: mdmon Tainted: G X 2.6.29-6-default #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8020ff31>] try_stack_unwind+0x70/0x127 [<ffffffff8020f0c0>] dump_trace+0x9a/0x2a6 [<ffffffff8020fc82>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x4c/0x58 [<ffffffff8020fc9e>] show_trace+0x10/0x12 [<ffffffff804f5777>] dump_stack+0x72/0x7b [<ffffffff80248353>] warn_slowpath+0xb1/0xed [<ffffffff8032ac84>] sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d [<ffffffff8032a6d1>] sysfs_add_file_mode+0x57/0x8b [<ffffffff8032c3d0>] internal_create_group+0xea/0x174 [<ffffffff8032c47b>] sysfs_create_group+0xe/0x13 [<ffffffff80448bc2>] do_md_run+0x54d/0x856 [<ffffffff80449130>] array_state_store+0x265/0x291 [<ffffffff80444ce6>] md_attr_store+0x81/0xa9 [<ffffffff8032a133>] sysfs_write_file+0xdf/0x114 [<ffffffff802d6b4e>] vfs_write+0xae/0x157 [<ffffffff802d6d05>] sys_write+0x4c/0xa5 [<ffffffff8020c4aa>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [<00007f1251cd3950>] 0x7f1251cd3950 ---[ end trace a00c6d28b22a64ae ]--- md: cannot register extra attributes for md126 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:462 sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d() Hardware name: sysfs: duplicate filename 'rd3' can not be created Modules linked in: raid10... Supported: Yes Pid: 8696, comm: mdmon Tainted: G W X 2.6.29-6-default #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8020ff31>] try_stack_unwind+0x70/0x127 [<ffffffff8020f0c0>] dump_trace+0x9a/0x2a6 [<ffffffff8020fc82>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x4c/0x58 [<ffffffff8020fc9e>] show_trace+0x10/0x12 [<ffffffff804f5777>] dump_stack+0x72/0x7b [<ffffffff80248353>] warn_slowpath+0xb1/0xed [<ffffffff8032ac84>] sysfs_add_one+0x35/0x3d [<ffffffff8032bb78>] sysfs_do_create_link+0xd3/0x141 [<ffffffff8032bc01>] sysfs_create_link+0xe/0x11 [<ffffffff80448ca7>] do_md_run+0x632/0x856 [<ffffffff80449130>] array_state_store+0x265/0x291 [<ffffffff80444ce6>] md_attr_store+0x81/0xa9 mdadm in another thread has just finished writing 'inactive' to array_state which will have the effect of setting mddev->pers to NULL. mdmon is still managing the array and before noticing the 'inactive' state writes 'clean' as part of its normal operation. The array_state_store() call for mdmon notices that mddev->pers is not set and calls do_md_run(). Is it the case that we only need array_state_store() to call do_md_run() when performing initial assembly? If so it seems a flag is needed to prevent reactivation before the old sysfs context is destroyed. Thanks, Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html