On 20:31, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Really? Easier than keeping only two 256-byte arrays for exp() and > > log() and use these at runtime to populate the (dynamically allocated) > > 64K GF multiplication table? That seems to be really simple and would > > still shave off 64K of kernel memory for raid5-only users. > > > > Andre > > Oh, you mean when the first raid6 device is started and not when the > module is loaded. Yes, that's what I was trying to say. Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
