Re: Performance of a software raid 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/04/2009 01:10, Johannes Segitz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 1:46 AM, John Robinson
<john.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would have thought it's because you're running in degraded mode and one in
3 sectors is having to be regenerated from the parity. It still seems a bit
slow, though.

i don't think that that is a problem. The data is there without
redundancy so i can't see
how there would be the need to calculate anything

There's no redundancy but it's still the RAID-5 4-disc layout with 3 data and 1 parity, the parity on a different disc in each stripe. In your case with a missing disc, for 3 stripes in 4 you have 2 data and 1 parity. Of course the parity is having to be calculated when you're writing, and whatever would be written to your missing disc is being discarded.

On the other hand if you were using RAID-0 over 3 discs there would be no need to calculate anything.

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux