Re: Spares Missing event in case of spare group?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil,

NeilBrown wrote:
Yes.  Remove the "spares=1" from each line.
The sole effect of this text is to tell --monitor to expect a spare, and
to complain if no spare is found.

Many thanks. I hadn't picked that up from the manpage, so here is a patch for your consideration:


diff --git a/mdadm.conf.5 b/mdadm.conf.5
index 40295be..b67bec4 100644
--- a/mdadm.conf.5
+++ b/mdadm.conf.5
@@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ this is mainly for compatibility with the output of
 .TP
 .B spares=
 The value is a number of spare devices to expect the array to have.
+The sole use of this keyword and value is as follows:
 .B mdadm \-\-monitor
 will report an array if it is found to have fewer than this number of
 spares when
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux