Re: Proposal: make RAID6 code optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday April 19, neilb@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> In 2.6.30, the Q syndrome code has been moved into a separate module,
> so raid456.ko should be quite a bit smaller.

Of course that doesn't really help as there will be a dependency
between raid456.ko and pq.ko so you cannot avoid having pq.ko loaded
while using raid5.

It might make sense to create a raid6 module that just contains 
The call to register_md_personality(raid6_personality) and some
linkage so that the code in raid456.ko can get to the code in pq.ko.

This is probably worth trying one the raid6 async offload stuff
stabilises.

NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux