Re: RAID 10 array won't assemble ... spare ... metadata - Correction Disappointing Report Back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 09:13:28PM +0100, Dave Fisher wrote:
> But when I ran mdadm -E on each of the partitions the counts were
> competely unchanged, i.e. sd[bcde]4 were still all at 219.
> 
> sda4 was still at 221

The above should have read like so:

But when I ran mdadm -E on each of the partitions the counts were
competely unchanged, i.e. 
  
  sd[bcd]4 were still all at 219
  
  sde4 was still at 218 
  
  sda4 was still at 221

Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux