On Wednesday March 18, maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Neil, > > I found this one while trying to figure out why 3-disk raid6 arrays > aren't supported. It's an obvious and trivial bug fix but probably > not important enough for stable as it only affects raid4. > Thanks! Applied. Have you tried a 3-disk raid6 yet? Any conclusions? NeilBrown > Regards > Andre > > commit ea30abef4d1f3aad635eb24db082f3531b573540 > Author: Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed Mar 18 13:43:08 2009 +0100 > > md: raid5 run(): Fix max_degraded for raid level 4. > > raid4 allows only one failed disk. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c > index a76ef52..ceb5924 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c > @@ -4484,7 +4484,7 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev) > */ > sector_t here_new, here_old; > int old_disks; > - int max_degraded = (mddev->level == 5 ? 1 : 2); > + int max_degraded = (mddev->level == 6 ? 2 : 1); > > if (mddev->new_level != mddev->level || > mddev->new_layout != mddev->layout || > -- > The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html