Andre Noll <maan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 08:34, Ruslan Sivak wrote:
>
>> I would guess the reason is that it doesn't make sense. As mentioned, if
>> you are going to create a 3 disk raid 6, it's essentially a raid1 over 3
>> disks, at which point you are better off with the raid-1. I don't think
>> there's a raid controller that would let you set something like this up, I
>> don't see why the softraid should.
>
> Well, Goswin mentioned some pretty good reasons I think.
>
> Andre
> --
> The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Raid6 is the only level that requires such "sanity".
Here is another scenario: Say you have a 2 disk raid1 and now want to
switch to 5 disk raid6. No problem, add 3 new disks, set up 1+2 disk
raid6, pvmove the data (don't you love LVM?), stop the raid1, grow the
raid6 to 5 disks.
It is clear that 1+2 disk raid6 only makes sense as a transitory step
but one that is usefull.
MfG
Goswin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
