Re: Why do I need 4 disks for a raid6?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08:34, Ruslan Sivak wrote:

> I would guess the reason is that it doesn't make sense.  As mentioned, if
> you are going to create a 3 disk raid 6, it's essentially a raid1 over 3
> disks, at which point you are better off with the raid-1.  I don't think
> there's a raid controller that would let you set something like this up, I
> don't see why the softraid should.

Well, Goswin mentioned some pretty good reasons I think.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux