Re: SSD data reliable vs. unreliable [Was: Re: Data Recovery from SSDs - Impact of trim?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/01/2009 23:56, Greg Freemyer wrote:
Once discard calls get into linux file systems mdraid and/or device
mapper could implement linux's own thin provisioning implementation.
Even with traditional disks that don't support unmap.  I gather that
is what the EMCs of the world will be doing in their platforms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thin_provisioning

Sounds more like a device mapper or LVM thing (than md/RAID) to me, but I'd definitely agree that this would be another great reason for block devices to implement map/unmap.

And I wonder if there's room for another dm/md device type which just implements these usage maps over traditional devices which don't support unmap (much as I was wondering a few weeks back about a soft DIF implementation over e.g. SATA devices). Darn it, I might just have to dig out my school books on C; it's a while since I offered a kernel patch.

Cheers,

John.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux