On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:33:30PM +0100, Tru Huynh wrote: > > CentOS 5.2, 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5PAE, sata_mv. Two dual-core Opterons @ 2.8 > > Ghz, 16 GB RAM. > any reason for using the 32 bits version instead of the 64 bits? > > you must also be aware of http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-15593 > > just my .2 cents Always welcome :) According to http://epubs.cclrc.ac.uk/bitstream/2943/ThumperReport.pdf, x4500 was shown to be unstable under centos/rhel 4.x (he didn't use mv_sata though). In any case, centos 4.x is way too old. I changed the kernel to 2.6.27.12-78.2.8.fc9.i686 and so far it is stable. x64 will be the next step. i686 is what our guys install by default, I didn't bother to reinstall it. -- Best Regards Vladimir Ivashchenko Chief Technology Officer PrimeTel, Cyprus - www.prime-tel.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
