Re: Roadmap for md/raid ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:01 AM,  <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In case of HD failure and resync, the md will start
> the operations from the beginning to the end.
> On the other hand,  it would be wise to sync first the
> used blocks (20% in the example) and later the others,
> if necessary at all.
> Because the array will get faster to a "safe state".
>

One idea/question is whether we can take advantage of the trim/discard
commands added for SSD support to allow filesystems to tell MD which
parts of the array it cares about.  So for a lightly populated array
we can try to treat free space as a second class citizen.

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux