Re: raid6's using not the best bandwidth method && raid6 algo is significantly slower in x86_64.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/11/2008 05:45, Igor Podlesny wrote:
2008/11/22 H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>:
[...]
       Please let us know when commiting the patch -- 20 % is valuable.
;-)

Looks like I was a bit too optimistic.  The 20% was because of the missed
prefetchnta, which means polluting the cache.

	Well, whatever it gives unless it's a regression. :-)

Not sure I agree with that - if the 20% improvement were to have a heavy impact on the rest of system performance when the system is already going to be underperforming, it may not worth having (though it might be an option for people who can afford the CPU or whatever).

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux