Re: RAID-6 question.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Justin Piszcz wrote:

The sync_speed_max was the default as well until I changed it, once I
lowered
the speed, the system was functional again.  By default its set quite high,
this appeared to be the root cause of the problem.


You probably ran out of CPU.  2-disk RAID-6 recovery is very CPU intensive.

	-hpa


Yeah, one core was pegged at 100% for the resync, another (md_raidX) process
was at ~35% on the second core. The third and fourth core were unused but immediately when I start the resync it definitley slowed down the system quite a bit and hurt interactivity and as I mentioned before *without* specifying a lower rebuild speed than the system's maximum I/O the system is unusable until the rebuild completes, perhaps its a combination of using all of the one core for the resync where raid5 may not? I recall w/raid5 I did not have to specify a lower limit for max_rebuild KiB/s..

Justin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux