Re: 2.6.27.6 question: ata_sff_hsm_move: ata15 (why always ata15)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:22:58 -0600
Robert Hancock <hancockr@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Justin Piszcz wrote:
> > I am trying to find out what the root cause of this error/problem is:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462425
> 
> The problem is that people assume that timeouts with DRDY like that bug 
> refers to must be the same problem when it is often not

The first stopping point is to apply the DRQ drain patch I sent to the
list some time ago and is hopefully lined up for 2.6.29. After that point
you can begin to look at the remaining cases, until then its hardly worth
it.

Alan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux