On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:09:33AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
However you seem to ignore the part of the threads that demonstrate my
understanding of the issue when I talk about mirroring from the failing drive
and the need to have md resort to the remaining components/parity in the event
of a failed block precisely to avoid md failing the mirroring process and
leaving you stuck :)
It was not 'ignored', in the sense i did not read or understand it:
I do agree that hot-sparing of a failing drive should be a native
feature of md
I was just pointing out what were, imho, errors in your
reasoning.
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
