Re: Proactive Drive Replacement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Greaves <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The main issue is that the drive being replaced almost certainly has a bad
> block.

Then, the replacement is not pro-active ;)

> This block could be recovered from the raid5 set but won't be.

This is what 'check' and 'repair' operations
(/sys/block/md*/md/sync_action) can be used for.


regards
   Mario
-- 
When Bruce Schneier uses double ROT13 encryption, the ciphertext is totally
unbreakable.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux