Robin Hill said: (by the date of Tue, 30 Sep 2008 19:21:29 +0100) > I don't see why it wouldn't be possible. I would think you'd get the > same performance leaving the RAM for caching though - that way anything > you _are_ actually reading/writing will be cached and the RAM is still > available for applications if needed. yes, I know. But in my case this won't work. This data which I want quickly is seldom accessed therefore it will not be cached. -- Janek Kozicki | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
