Re: Q: Is this how 'check' works (on raid10 in particular)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 08:36:33PM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> The patch Keld sent me makes a significant difference:
> 
> Before:
> (Stock 2.6.25.11 x86-64 openSUSE 11.0 kernel raid10 module):   4.5h to 5.5h
> 
> After:
> Same kernel, minor changes to raid10.c and compiled:  1h 56m.
> 
> ::
> 
> Aug  4 18:37:09 turnip kernel: md: data-check of RAID array md0
> Aug  4 20:33:24 turnip kernel: md: md0: data-check done.
> 
> 
> > My idea is to do the checks in bigger blocks, then you would minimize
> > the trashing, by minimizing the number of times you need to move the
> > head.  And this would not need much change in the code. I have done a
> > patch to do this, but I have not yet tested it.

Thanks for testing it. It sounds good, and as I expected it to behave.
I think the patch is clean and I have sent it to the list and Neil for
inclusion in the tree.

Best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux